Not this year. Since 1999. That single number is the reason a Pagani is funded differently from anything else on the road, and it is where every conversation about lending against one has to start.
Most vehicle finance rests on a published figure. A list price for a new car, a trade guide for a used one. Neither exists here in any form a lender can lean on. A Zonda Tricolore was built three times. The Huayra Epitome was built once. There is no comparable, because there is no population to draw one from.
So the advance is set against a valuation of the specific car, and what decides that valuation is the paperwork: build sheet, ownership chain, factory correspondence, service history through Modena. On a car of this kind the documentation is not supporting evidence for the value. It is a substantial part of the value.
This is specialist lending, arranged with no minimum advance, for a company or for you personally. No manufacturer scheme covers these cars, and the mainstream lenders that quote on supercars will not write a facility against a run of three.
632 cars across 22 road variants, on one scale. The bar for a run of three is not a rounding error, it is the whole lending problem. See the same figures as a table.
The car that established the marque, and the one where provenance decides everything. Values are set against the specific car rather than the model, because on runs of three and five cars there is no such thing as a comparable. A documented history and a known chain of ownership are worth more here than mileage.
The only Pagani line with variants built in three figures, which makes the coupe and the Roadster the closest thing the marque has to a car a lender can find comparables for. The special series alongside them, built in runs of one to eight, are valued exactly like a Zonda.
In production, but that does not put it in the same category as any other current car this portfolio finances. Every coupe was allocated to a customer before launch, so there is no list price to compute a payment from and the advance is set against what the car actually cost or is now worth.
Every variant below was built once or in a run of five or fewer. On these, an agreed valuation is not a fallback when a book figure is unavailable. It is the only honest method there is.
| Car | Built | Share of marque | Power |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zonda Revo Barchetta | 1 | 0.16% | 789 bhp |
| Huayra Epitome | 1 | 0.16% | 852 bhp |
| Zonda Tricolore | 3 | 0.47% | 661 bhp |
| Zonda HP Barchetta | 3 | 0.47% | 789 bhp |
| Huayra Tricolore | 3 | 0.47% | 829 bhp |
| Zonda C12 | 5 | 0.79% | 444 bhp |
| Zonda Cinque | 5 | 0.79% | 669 bhp |
| Zonda Cinque Roadster | 5 | 0.79% | 669 bhp |
| Huayra Imola | 5 | 0.79% | 827 bhp |
| Huayra Codalunga | 5 | 0.79% | 829 bhp |
4 further variants are track only and cannot be road registered as built. They are listed on this site and marked, because quoting finance against one as though it were a road car would misdescribe the asset.
Tell us the car and the shape of the deal. We will come back with which structures it supports and what they are likely to cost.
We will come back with which loan types the car supports and what each one is likely to cost. If none of them work, that is the answer you get.